This report investigates how the impact of humanitarian aid is measured. It maps out the existing concepts, methods and practises of impact assessment used by humanitarian actors. The focus is on the mechanics of measurement and analysis, and it looks at how this is implicated in the humanitarian system, how it is conceived and how it operates. The report asked questions around how impact can be measured, why this is increasingly being demanded, and whether it is possible to do it better. It also explores the benefits, dangers and costs that paying greater attention to impact might entail.

Measuring the impact of humanitarian interventions is difficult because of a lack of basic data. It faces different problems - for example, relief interventions are often of short duration, insecurity may limit access to populations, and the space for analysis and research is constrained. Furthermore there is the risk that the measurement of humanitarian aid becomes to technical and that it doesn’t take sufficient account of the principled endeavour in which the process as well as the outcome is important.

Analysing the impact of a humanitarian intervention is not straightforward. A number of constraints and factors particular to humanitarian action make impact measurement difficult. These constraints are difficulties of the operating environment, the need to act quickly in situations of immediate crisis, an organisational culture that values action over analysis, and the fact that there is little consensus around the core objectives of humanitarian aid.

There are several tools that measure the impact of humanitarian intervention. However this report concludes that organisations have limited skills and capacity to use the existing tools, and as a result there is a need for greater investment in the skills and capacities needed to demonstrate impact more robustly. Overall, there has been significant under-investment in evaluation and impact analysis according to the report.

The report proposes that in order to improve impact analysis

- Measuring the impact of humanitarian aid should not be restricted to the project level. More system-wide evaluations are required;

- Project-based approaches should be adopted that focus on determining the impact of a particular intervention through a pathway from inputs to impact;

- Impact should not be limited to the evaluation process. Impact should be considered in ongoing monitoring processes, and through techniques such as real-time evaluation.

Bibliographic Details

Author: Charles-Antione Hofmann, Les Roberts, Jeremy Shoham and Paul Harvey

Publisher: 2004, Overseas Development Institute

Impact Assessment (General)

Online Source(s)

Where possible, links are provided here to the original publication sources. Click on Source Title to open the document, but please note that this redirects you to a different website.

Language	Format	Source Title
English	PDF document	Measuring the impact of humanitarian aid: A review of current practice